endless forms, most beautiful

gjmueller:

Technology in the Classroom: Assets and Liabilities

It is my contention that as educational and classroom leaders we have a responsibility to set clear expectations, which is Job One of all good leaders. I’d like to share one practical strategy we used to do just that in terms of communicating our expectations for using technology in the classroom.
 First we gathered all our small group facilitators (we use clinicians, basic and social scientists and student fellows) for an hour-long event in which we asked them to work together to do three things: 1) identify the assets of these tools; 2) identify the liabilities of these tools; and 3) establish some reasonable ground rules to maximize the assets and minimize the liabilities.

gjmueller:

Technology in the Classroom: Assets and Liabilities

It is my contention that as educational and classroom leaders we have a responsibility to set clear expectations, which is Job One of all good leaders. I’d like to share one practical strategy we used to do just that in terms of communicating our expectations for using technology in the classroom.

First we gathered all our small group facilitators (we use clinicians, basic and social scientists and student fellows) for an hour-long event in which we asked them to work together to do three things: 1) identify the assets of these tools; 2) identify the liabilities of these tools; and 3) establish some reasonable ground rules to maximize the assets and minimize the liabilities.

dangurewitch:

Recently it came to my attention that the word “YOLO,” an acronym standing for “You Only Live Once,” has become popular with the kids (as in “Fine, I’ll do another shot - YOLO!”). I did some research and I found out that YOLO is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of hip 2012 lingo. Get ready to feel really old, because I had never heard of any of these, but apparently they’re being used everywhere:YOLO: You Only Live OnceYOLOLO: You Only “LOL” OnceYOTROLOLOO: You Only “Trololo” OnceYOLOLO NOHOMO: You Only “LOL” Once, and I don’t mean that in the gay wayYOWO SOSOPOLOS: You Only Wear Orange So-So Polos“You’ll never win the fashion competition. YOWO SOSOPOLOS.”YOWO SOSOPOLOS SOHOMO: You Only Wear Orange So-So Polos, and I do mean that in a very gay way“You’ll never win the fashion competition, sweetbuns. YOWO SOSOPOLOS SOHOMO.”YOYOKO ONOSOCO: You’re Only Yoko Ono, So Chill Out“You don’t have to create world peace by yourself. YOYOKO ONOSOCO.” (Must be spoken only to Yoko Ono)YOHOHOHO BOSODOCOCOA: You Only “HoHoHo” But Once, So Drink Our Cocoa (Must be spoken only to Santa Claus)YOLOMOFO HELLOMOTO: You Only Live Once, Motherfucker (Must be spoken only by Samuel L. Jackson in a Motorola commercial)YOYOYO OSO YOYOSOLO OWO LOCO PO-PO: You Only Yo-Yo Once, So Yo-Yo Solo, Obviously Without Crazy Police Officers

dangurewitch:

Recently it came to my attention that the word “YOLO,” an acronym standing for “You Only Live Once,” has become popular with the kids (as in “Fine, I’ll do another shot - YOLO!”). I did some research and I found out that YOLO is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of hip 2012 lingo. Get ready to feel really old, because I had never heard of any of these, but apparently they’re being used everywhere:

YOLO: You Only Live Once

YOLOLO: You Only “LOL” Once

YOTROLOLOO: You Only “Trololo” Once

YOLOLO NOHOMO: You Only “LOL” Once, and I don’t mean that in the gay way

YOWO SOSOPOLOS: You Only Wear Orange So-So Polos
“You’ll never win the fashion competition. YOWO SOSOPOLOS.”

YOWO SOSOPOLOS SOHOMO: You Only Wear Orange So-So Polos, and I do mean that in a very gay way
“You’ll never win the fashion competition, sweetbuns. YOWO SOSOPOLOS SOHOMO.”

YOYOKO ONOSOCO: You’re Only Yoko Ono, So Chill Out
“You don’t have to create world peace by yourself. YOYOKO ONOSOCO.” (Must be spoken only to Yoko Ono)

YOHOHOHO BOSODOCOCOA: You Only “HoHoHo” But Once, So Drink Our Cocoa (Must be spoken only to Santa Claus)

YOLOMOFO HELLOMOTO: You Only Live Once, Motherfucker (Must be spoken only by Samuel L. Jackson in a Motorola commercial)

YOYOYO OSO YOYOSOLO OWO LOCO PO-PO: You Only Yo-Yo Once, So Yo-Yo Solo, Obviously Without Crazy Police Officers

(via popculturebrain)

rayax:

We humans are not the only living beings capable of love, morality and co-operation. Many living creatures are known to perform seemingly selfless acts in order to protect the genome of their close members or even an entire tribe. Altruism operates as a crucial mechanism in animal evolution because it allows adaptations to occur at a group level. Of course, there are always the few selfish individuals in a group but it is evident that altruistic groups generally beat selfish ones- unity always wins.
In many social insects such as ants, wasps, bees and termites, workers devote their entire lives to the queen, without which they stand no chance of breeding themselves and passing on their genome. Vampire bats tend to roost in the same place every night, get to know each other and will disgorge blood for a hungry neighbor if the favor is likely to be re-payed. Moreover, Vervet monkeys will come to the aid of others who have helped them in the past. The point is that such mottos of “family first”, “Help your friends and they’ll help you”, “Safety in numbers”,”Care for the sick and elderly” are all universally accepted in nature.
In fact, Some living beings even tend to go beyond their own species. Dogs are known to occasionally adopt orphaned cats, squirrels or ducks. Dolphins tend to assist sick, injured or struggling animals, their extended evolutionary kin.
Evidently, altruism and basic aspects of morality are hard-wired into almost every living creature as a result of its evolutionary benefits.

rayax:

We humans are not the only living beings capable of love, morality and co-operation. Many living creatures are known to perform seemingly selfless acts in order to protect the genome of their close members or even an entire tribe. Altruism operates as a crucial mechanism in animal evolution because it allows adaptations to occur at a group level. Of course, there are always the few selfish individuals in a group but it is evident that altruistic groups generally beat selfish ones- unity always wins.

In many social insects such as ants, wasps, bees and termites, workers devote their entire lives to the queen, without which they stand no chance of breeding themselves and passing on their genome. Vampire bats tend to roost in the same place every night, get to know each other and will disgorge blood for a hungry neighbor if the favor is likely to be re-payed. Moreover, Vervet monkeys will come to the aid of others who have helped them in the past. The point is that such mottos of “family first”, “Help your friends and they’ll help you”, “Safety in numbers”,”Care for the sick and elderly” are all universally accepted in nature.

In fact, Some living beings even tend to go beyond their own species. Dogs are known to occasionally adopt orphaned cats, squirrels or ducks. Dolphins tend to assist sick, injured or struggling animals, their extended evolutionary kin.

Evidently, altruism and basic aspects of morality are hard-wired into almost every living creature as a result of its evolutionary benefits.

(via lookingforether)

jtotheizzoe:

arstechnica:

Tupac’s cool (yet creepy) return from the dead to perform at Coachella: Here’s how it was done.

Tupac’s Return … How was it done?

This a great explanation of what was not, in fact, a hologram, but rather an illusion called “Pepper’s Ghost”.

The optical techniques behind this illusion actually date back to the 16th century, developed by camera obscura tweaker Giambattista della Porta. Which I think is important becausethe Machiavelli/Makaveli theory is just too much fun it’s all part of the plan he shall return.

Full explanation at the link, but the Tupac that we see above is a hi-res computer rendering projected onto an invisible sheet of Mylar foil from some point off-stage. No word on if the footage and vocals were an actor or reconstructed from previous performances.

Awesome use of science, all the same.

Many adults are put off when youngsters pose scientific questions. Children ask why the sun is yellow, or what a dream is, or how deep you can dig a hole, or when is the world’s birthday, or why we have toes. Too many teachers and parents answer with irritation or ridicule, or quickly move on to something else. Why adults should pretend to omniscience before a five-year-old, I can’t for the life of me understand. What’s wrong with admitting that you don’t know? Children soon recognize that somehow this kind of question annoys many adults. A few more experiences like this, and another child has been lost to science. There are many better responses. If we have an idea of the answer, we could try to explain. If we don’t, we could go to the encyclopedia or the library. Or we might say to the child: “I don’t know the answer. Maybe no one knows. Maybe when you grow up, you’ll be the first to find out.

Carl Sagan (via ohioclaire)

Absolutely. This.

(via kristinamarie)

(Source: skaterboytae, via world-shaker)

Monkey’s all acting ape-like

discoverynews:

Baboons Can Recognize Words
Baboons can learn to tell the difference between real four-letter words and nonsense combinations of letters. And once they figure out the patterns, these monkeys can guess with impressive accuracy whether a new word is real or fake.
Because baboons can’t actually read, a new study supports the theory that the brains of our primate ancestors held the necessary hardware for understanding written words long before humans evolved. Only after we starting writing and reading about 5,400 years or so did we apply our object-recognition abilities to letter symbols.
By the end of the training period, which included about 50,000 trials for each animal, all of the baboons had learned to recognize at least 81 words at an accuracy rate of about 75 percent, the researchers report today in the journal Science. One animal learned more than 300 words.
keep reading
image: Baboon eyes, Corbis

Monkey’s all acting ape-like

discoverynews:

Baboons Can Recognize Words

Baboons can learn to tell the difference between real four-letter words and nonsense combinations of letters. And once they figure out the patterns, these monkeys can guess with impressive accuracy whether a new word is real or fake.

Because baboons can’t actually read, a new study supports the theory that the brains of our primate ancestors held the necessary hardware for understanding written words long before humans evolved. Only after we starting writing and reading about 5,400 years or so did we apply our object-recognition abilities to letter symbols.

By the end of the training period, which included about 50,000 trials for each animal, all of the baboons had learned to recognize at least 81 words at an accuracy rate of about 75 percent, the researchers report today in the journal Science. One animal learned more than 300 words.

keep reading

image: Baboon eyes, Corbis

jtotheizzoe:

What Is A Flame?

When Alan Alda was 11 years old, he asked his teacher what a flame was. He didn’t like the answer he got. So now, in partnership with the Center for Communicating Science, he decided to ask the world’s scientists and science communicators to answer this question in terms that the world’s 11-year-olds can understand. That’s The Flame Challenge.

The entry above is my favorite (although I am biased, because it’s by a team of people that I admire). This is by The Fabulab, a project of Jeanne Garbarino, Deborah Berebichez, and Perrin Ireland (with the help of a few others).

I would have done one too, but it seems like all my grad school friends are too “busy” or something to work on awesome video projects, pssh. Anyway, these ladies have my vote! What do you think?

(Source: vimeo.com)

jtotheizzoe:

Dear Octopus,

That is not your house. That is a trash. 

I am sorry we made all the trash.

I hope you get a real house one day. One that’s clean.

-Joe

Dear octopus,

(Source: ilovecephalopods)